Search for: All records

The literature on dynamic capabilities has long faced the challenge of empirically investigating a concept that is inherently intangible, complex, and organization-specific. Empirical clarity is crucial because dynamic capabilities are argued to be essential for achieving sustainable competitive advantage in changing environments, and only empirical research can validate this claim. Despite significant advancements, issues related to measurement, methodologies, and the robustness of findings persist. This article addresses these concerns by offering key recommendations for empirical research in this domain. First, we underscore the importance of construct validity and the need for clear definitions and focused dimensions of dynamic capabilities. Second, we recommend empirical designs with time lags between the measurement of dynamic capabilities and their antecedents or outcomes, and sector-specific studies to capture the temporal dynamics and contextual nuances. Third, we encourage leveraging established survey measures, close proxies in archival research, and innovative experiments and qualitative methods. Finally, we highlight the potential of multimethod approaches to triangulate findings and enhance theoretical insight. Our hope is to help future researchers address the unique challenges of studying dynamic capabilities empirically, paving the way for continued progress in this significant field of strategic management.